Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Can J Surg ; 65(2): E188-E192, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35292524

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown increases in length of stay (LOS), morbidity and mortality when the standard for surgical fixation of hip fracture of 48 hours is not met. However, few investigators have analyzed LOS as a primary outcome, and most used time of diagnosis as opposed to time of fracture as the reference point. We examined the effect of time to surgical fixation of hip fracture, measured from time of fracture, on length of hospital stay; the secondary outcome was average 1-year mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to 1 of 2 tertiary care centres in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, with a hip fracture from Jan. 1, 2014, to Dec. 31, 2018. We analyzed 3 groups based on timing of surgical fixation after fracture: less than 24 hours (group 1), 24-48 hours (group 2) and more than 48 hours (group 3). We assessed statistical significance using 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Of the 692 patients included in the study, 212 (30.6%) were in group 1, 360 (52.0%) in group 2 and 120 (17.3%) in group 3. A delay to surgical fixation exceeding 48 hours was associated with a significantly longer LOS, by an average of 2.9 and 2.8 days compared to groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.04); there was no significant difference in LOS between groups 1 and 2. A significant difference in average 1-year mortality was observed between groups 1 (11%) and 3 (26%) (p = 0.004), and groups 2 (13%) and 3 (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Surgical fixation beyond 48 hours after hip fracture resulted in significantly increased LOS and 1-year mortality. Further research should be conducted to evaluate reasons for delays to surgery and the effects of these delays on time to surgical fixation as measured from time of fracture.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures , Canada , Fracture Fixation , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Length of Stay , Retrospective Studies
2.
Can J Surg ; 62(4): 270-274, 2019 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31348635

ABSTRACT

Background: Pelvic ramus fractures in older patients are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of literature on fractures of the pelvis in this age group. The purpose of this study was to report mortality rates following such injuries. In addition, we aimed to describe and quantify the important resultant morbidity in this vulnerable population. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all low-energy pelvic ramus fractures in patients more than age 60 years that occurred between January 2000 and December 2005. Data on survival, hospital length of stay, ambulatory status and place of residence were recorded. For comparison, we calculated the mortality rate for a surrogate age- and sex-matched group using Statistics Canada survival data for use as an uninjured control group. Results: We identified 43 patients (32 women [74%]; mean age 79.4 yr) with isolated low-energy pelvic ramus fractures over the study period. The 1- and 5-year mortality rates were 16.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8%­30.3%) and 58.1% (95% CI 43.3%­71.6%), respectively, both significantly higher than the point estimates for the control group (6.6% and 31.3%, respectively). Following injury, 14/39 patients (36%) permanently required increased ambulatory aids, and 8 (20%) required a permanent increase in everyday level of care. Conclusion: The results suggest that there may be increased mortality and morbidity following low-energy pattern pelvic ramus fractures in an older population compared to age- and sex-matched uninjured control subjects.


Contexte: Les fractures du bassin chez les personnes âgées sont associées à une morbidité et une mortalité substantielles. La littérature sur les fractures du bassin dans ce groupe d'âge est peu abondante. Le but de cette étude était donc de faire état des taux de mortalité suite à de telles blessures. Nous avons aussi voulu décrire et quantifier l'importante morbidité qui en résulte chez cette population vulnérable. Méhodes: Nous avons effectué une revue rétrospective de tous les cas de fractures du bassin consécutives à un traumatisme de faible énergie chez des patients de plus de 60 ans survenues entre janvier 2000 et décembre 2005. Les données de survie, la durée de l'hospitalisation, le statut ambulatoire et le lieu de résidence ont été notées. À des fins de comparaison, nous avons calculé le taux de mortalité pour un groupe témoin indemme assorti selon l'âge et le sexe en nous servant des données de survie de Statistique Canada. Résultats: Nous avons recensé 43 patients (32 femmes [74 %]; âge moyen 79,4 ans) porteurs de fractures du bassin isolées consécutives à un traumatisme de faible énergie pour la période de l'étude. Les taux de mortalité à 1 an et à 5 ans ont été de 16,3 % (intervalle confiance [IC] de 95 % 7,8 %­30,3 %) et 58,1 % (IC de 95 % 43,3 %­71,6 %), respectivement, tous deux significativement plus élevés que les estimations ponctuelles pour le groupe témoin (6,6 % et 31,3 %, respectivement). Après le traumatisme, 14 patients sur 39 (36 %) ont eu besoin de façon permanente et croissante de dispositifs d'aide à la marche et 8 (20 %) ont eu besoin de façon permanente d'un niveau de soins quotidiens accru. Conclusion: Les résultats donnent à penser que la mortalité et la morbidité pourraient être plus marquées après une fracture de la hanche consécutive à un traumatisme de faible énergie chez la population âgée, comparativement à des témoins assortis selon l'âge et le sexe.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/mortality , Mobility Limitation , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fractures, Bone/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Newfoundland and Labrador/epidemiology , Pubic Bone/injuries , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
4.
Can J Surg ; 46(3): 183-6, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12812239

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of 3 common models of walking boots (Walkabout, Samson Walker and Equalizer Premium Walker) to that of a fibreglass cast in protecting an arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint in the early postoperative period, we carried out a biomechanical study in cadavers in the bioengineering laboratory at Memorial University of Newfoundland. METHODS: Two cadaver models of a first MTP joint arthrodesis were prepared by placing a strain gauge at the joint. This provided a measure of the bending moment across the fusion site. Walking was simulated by applying a force to the sole of the cadaver foot at multiple positions from heel to toe, representing the stages of gait from heel strike to toe off. RESULTS: For both cadaver specimens, the Walkabout boot had the lowest mean moment. The Walkabout and Sampson Walker boots were better than the Equalizer Premium Walker boot and the fibreglass cast (p < 0.05), but the Walkabout boot was the best (p < 0.05). Also, for both specimens, the Walkabout boot had the smallest absolute maximum moment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: On a first MTP joint arthrodesis site, removable cast boots provide the same, if not more, reduction of force as a traditional cast.


Subject(s)
Arthrodesis , Metatarsophalangeal Joint/surgery , Protective Clothing , Shoes , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Humans , Postoperative Period , Weight-Bearing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...